A Guy, A Girl and 1,001 Movies

REVISION!

2010-03-12T14:07:00.000-08:00

Here is a list of the films on the list that we both saw before we started this blog and will not be reviewing for the time being:

It Happened One Night- 1934

Captain Blood- 1935

Mutiny on the Bounty- 1935

A Night at the Opera- 1935

The 39 Steps- 1935

Modern Times- 1936

Swing Time- 1936

My Man Godfrey- 1936

Dodsworth- 1936

Grand Illusion- 1937

Snow White and the Seven Dwarves- 1937

Bringing Up Baby- 1938

Stagecoach- 1939

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington- 1939

The Wizard of Oz- 1939

Gone with the Wind- 1939

Ninotchka- 1939

Rules of the Game- 1939

Wuthering Heights- 1939

His Girl Friday- 1940

Fantasia- 1940

The Philadelphia Story- 1940

The Grapes of Wrath- 1940

Dance, Girl, Dance- 1940

Pinocchio-1940

The Bank Dick-1940

Citizen Kane- 1941

The Lady Eve- 1941

The Maltese Falcon- 1941

Dumbo- 1941

The Palm Beach Story- 1942

Casablanca- 1942

The Magnificent Ambersons- 1942

Yankee Doodle Dandy- 1942

The Ox-Bow Incident- 1942

To Have and Have Not- 1944

Laura- 1944

Gaslight- 1944

Double Indemnity- 1944

Mildred Pierce- 1945

The Children of Paradise- 1945

The Long Weekend- 1945

Detour- 1945

The Best Years of Our Lives- 1946

Brief Encounter- 1946

The Killers- 1946

Great Expectations- 1946

It's a Wonderful Life- 1946

Spring in a Small Town- 1948

The Lady from Shanghai- 1948

The Red Shoes- 1948

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre- 1948

Rashomon- 1950

All About Eve- 1950

Sunset Blvd.-1950

A Streetcar Named Desire- 1951

Strangers on a Train- 1951

The African Queen- 1951

Diary of a Country Priest- 1951

An American in Paris-1951

A Place in the Sun- 1951

Singin' in the Rain- 1952

Ikiru- 1952

High Noon- 1952

From Here to Eternity- 1953

Wages of Fear- 1953

Mr. Hulot's Holiday- 1953

Shane- 1953

On the Waterfront- 1954

Rear Window- 1954

The Barefoot Contessa- 1954

Guys and Dolls- 1955

Rebel Without a Cause- 1955

Night and Fog- 1955

The Night of the Hunter- 1955

The Searchers- 1956

Giant- 1956

The Bridge on the River Kwai- 1957

Gigi- 1958

Vertigo- 1958

North by Northwest- 1959

Some Like it Hot- 1959

Breathless- 1959

Ben Hur- 1959

Psycho- 1960

The Apartment- 1960

Breakfast at Tiffany's- 1961

The West Side Story- 1961

To Kill a Mockingbird- 1962

The Manchurian Candidate- 1962

The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance- 1962

Goldfinger- 1964

My Fair Lady- 1964

Dr. Strangelove- 1964

Doctor Zhivago- 1965

The Battle of Algiers- 1965

The Sound of Music- 1965

In the Heat of the Night- 1967

The Graduate- 1967

Bonnie and Clyde- 1967

The Jungle Book- 1967

Planet of the Apes- 1968

2001: A Space Odyssey- 1968

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid- 1969

Midnight Cowboy- 1969

Easy Rider- 1969

The Wild Bunch- 1969

Little Big Man- 1970

Patton- 1970

MASH- 1970

A Clockwork Orange- 1971

The Shining- 1980

2010-02-06T17:07:00.000-08:00

G.B.

Length: 119 minutes

Director: Stanley Kubrick

Cast: Jack Nicholson, Shelley Duval, Danny Lloyd, Scatman Crothers

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/

Eric's Impressions: When people ask me who my favorite director is I always respond Martin Scorsese, but the more and more I watch Stanley Kubrick's movies, the latter makes me re-think that question. Jack Nicholson is my all-time favorite actor and it's not just because people have said I look like him. He's so perfect for this role and I was amazed to hear that author Stephen King wasn't happy with him being cast or with Kubrick's interpretation of his novel. Though I have the utmost respect for Mr. King, I hope he has reconsidered this sentiment over the years because like everything Kubrick and Nicholson have done, this is nothing short of brilliant! The opening title sequence filmed over the Colorado Rockies sets the tone for this horror/psychological thriller. Even more amazing than King's opinion is the rejection of this film by the motion picture industry at the time it came out. In fact, Kubrick was nominated for an infamous Razzie as Worst Director??? Though I'm not a huge fan of Shelley Duval - and her acting at times in the early going of this is downright annoying - she didn't deserve the flak she got for her portrayal of the psychotic caretaker's wife. She got better and better as the film went on and you felt her character's true fear for her life in the end. I will rank this right up there with any horror film ever made as well as any Hitchcock thriller.

Natalie's Impressions: I am not a fan of horror films and probably never would have watched this film if we hadn't been doing this blog. Except maybe I would have given this one an exception because it is Kubrick. I have now seen all his films except his really early first three films and one or two others. After I saw Barry Lyndon last year, I came to the conclusion that Kubrick is one of the best directors of all time. When you look at his filmography, you get the impression that his goal was not only to make a film from every genre but to make the best film ever of that genre. A lot of great directors like Scorsesee or Spielberg have their genres that poeple know them for- granted Spielberg has a similarly broad range like Kubrick- but I can't think of any other director that has been so underappreciated. I simply cannot fathom how this film not only didn't get any critical acclaim when it came out, but actually got panned. I can only chalk it up to the theory of randomness. It is completely random which films do well and which don't. We like to think it is because of the talented actors and directors, and to some extent it is but ultimately randomness theory is the only way to explain such a blatant lapse in judgement from so many people. Maybe the world just wasn't ready for this film when it came out, although I find that hard to believe given that the previous decade was full of horror films that were as provocative and disturbing as this. This film is not a typical horror film, however. It does have some characteristics of horror films, but this film actually had an ok ending. It wasn't all bad and evil. And I can't think of any other horror films since Hitchcock that have the same amazing cinematographic quality as this film. Kubrick is the master of using camera angles to tell a story. It is only one of many talents he had that separates him from other directors in my mind. I only hope that as time goes by, his films continue to get more and more appreciation.

COUNTDOWN: Just 949 movies to go!

MOVING FORWARD

2010-02-06T16:55:00.001-08:00

If you can't tell from our posts thus far, we're having a tremendous time with this blog. With that being said, we've decided to mix things up moving forward in 2010 and stop watching/reviewing the movies in chronological order. We're going to finish the list watching them in random and/or themed order. We'll keep you posted. Thanks for reading.

Gold Diggers of 1933- 1933

2010-02-03T16:05:00.003-08:00

Length: 96 minutes

Director: Mervyn LeRoy

Cast: Warren William, Joan Blondell, Aline MacMahon, Ruby Keeler, Dick Powell, Guy Kibbee, Ned Sparks, Ginger Rogers

www.imdb.com/title/tt0024069/

Eric's Impressions: Like the last film reviewed, here we ago again with another story behind the story of a theater production. This one does dig a little deeper with a statement on how true love doesn't know a price tag. The Warner Brothers regulars are all here including Joan Blondell, Dick Powell, Ginger Rogers (still playing minor roles at this point) and my personal favorite, Guy Kibbee. The scenes of Mr. Kibbee posing in the mirror with a puppy that eerily looks just like him and falling drunkenly in love with a showgirl will have you in stitches. I also like the message of "Remember My Forgotten Man" and the other Depression-era numbers that serve as tributes to the those most hurt by the economic times of the late '20s and early 1930's.

Natalie's Impressions: Of the last few musicals from this period that I have seen, this one is the more complex and thematically mature. There is more to it than just a love story or just a movie about making movies. It has a couple of different twists to it. It is not just one of those films Warner Brothers just churned out that fit the cookie cutter musical mold. It is an introspective look at the pyschological effects of the Depression on all classes, especially in light of the fact that it occurred not long after World War I. For those of the Lost Generation that survived, life didn't get much easier. This film is partly in recognition of those men. But lets not forget that this is a comedy! While I didn't laugh nearly as hard watching this film as Footlight Parade, for instance, there were some comedic gem moments with Guy Kibbee.

COUNTDOWN: Just 950 movies to go!

Footlight Parade- 1933

2010-02-03T16:05:00.001-08:00

Length: 104 minutes

Director: Lloyd Bacon

Cast: James Cagney, Joan Blondell, Ruby Keeler, Dick Powell, Frank McHugh, Ruth Donnelly, Guy Kibbee, Hugh Herbert, Claire Dodd, Gordon Westcott, Arthur Hohl, Renee Whitney, Barbara Rogers, Paul Porcasi, Philip Faversham

www.imdb.com/title/tt0024028/

Eric's Impressions: This is one of many films on the list during the 1930s about what occurs behind the scenes of a theatrical/musical production. Many of the players are the same in these including Dick Powell, Joan Blondell, Ruby Keeler and Guy Kibbee just to name a few. What makes this one stand out is Mr. J-A-M-E-S Cagney. I still haven't seen a film of his that I didn't like and this one is no different. Cagney plays the producer always trying to outdo himself and the final three production numbers promise to blow you away as the underlining love story comes to a close. This was Hollywood showing off and we the viewers reap the benefits of a true mind trip.

Natalie's Impressions: This film could be my favorite musical because of one scene that made me laugh till I cried. Even when I think back on it I laugh out loud. James Cagney wakes up with a cat in his lap after falling asleep at the office. His secretary comes in and he wakes up and immediately starts talking a mile a minute about cats as the new theme for a prologue. He is talking a mile a minute and the fact that it is Cagney just makes it even funnier. It was so unexpected! Cagney made the film for me. Not only is his acting and comic timing right on the money, but he even dances some fancy footwork! Visually the film is stunning. The synchronized swimming is impressive but so is the sheer number of dancers they had to get to perform some of the scenes. For people who like showy musicals, this is the one!

COUNTDOWN: Just 951 movies to go!

Freaks-1932

2010-02-03T15:28:00.000-08:00

U.S.

Length: 64 minutes

Director: Tod Browning

www.imdb.com/title/tt0022913

Eric's Impressions: It's no surprise that this film was directed by Tod Browing - the Tim Burton of his time - the champion of soceity's outcasts. I was disappointed to find out that the studio made Browning change the ending to something happy because it wasn't needed. There was plenty of pleasure to be found in the revolt of the freaks against the evil trapeze artist and strongman. The opening message along with the early barkings of the carnival baker foreshadow the appreciation you should and must have at the conclusion of the film for all people no matter what he/she may look like.

Natalie's Impressions: I was afraid I would be too deeply disturbed by this film to get through it but I loved every second of it. There is a tremendous amount of heart in this film. Not only does it send a very important moral lesson, but it is is so artfully done. However, it does strike me as slightly ironic that the people in the film will be forever immortalized and remembered for the "freaks " that they were and not for anything else they did in life. In regards to the ending, I almost don't mind the way Browning had to end the film because the final scene is not what I remember from the film. The penultimate scene that he wanted to end the film with, is the one that stands out in my mind when I think of this movie.

COUNTDOWN: Just 952 movies to go!

M-1931

2009-12-16T19:34:00.004-08:00

Germany

Length: 117 minutes

Director: Fritz Lang

Cast: Peter Lorre, Ellen Widmann, Inge Langut, Otto Wernicke, Theodor Loos

www.imdb.com/title/tt0022100/

Eric's Impressions: One of cinema's most haunting films, this one will leave you confused in the end as you will find some sympathy for a person who kills children. Played brilliantly by the always memorable Peter Lorre, the main character is a man running from the police for the crimes he has committed. At first you want the murderer to be caught, but when you find out how corrupt the police and government of this German city are, you almost want him to get away. Lorre will creep you out with his pre-killing whistling and overall demeanor. The stories of how director Fritz Lang mistreated his actors are legendary, but in a way they may have assisted Lang in reaching a higher level of acting prowess.

Natalie's Impressions: What struck me most about this film was its timeless message. This film is still very relevant today and that is a frightening fact. When Eric first told me about this film, I swore I would never watch it because it sounded like a really stupid horror movie but it is not at all a stupid horror movie. Above all, it is sad. Very very very sad. I am glad I did finally see it because it moved me a great deal. It is a film that will stay with you for a long time. A perfect film, in my opinion. The timing of the scenes, the length of them, the action-reaction time of the actors with each other is flawless. This is superb directing by Lang.

COUNTDOWN: Just 953 movies to go!

City Lights- 1931

2009-12-16T19:34:00.001-08:00

U.S.

Length: 87 minutes

Director: Charlie Chaplin

Cast: Virginia Cherrill, Florence Lee, Harry Myers, El Ernest Garcia, Hank Mann, Charles Chaplin

www.imdb.com/title/tt0021749

Eric's Impressions: When people ask me to list my all-time favorite movies, this one comes up early in the discussion. If the final scene between the blind girl and the Tramp - in what is arguably film's greatest scene - doesn't make you cry then you probably don't have a heart. This movie has it all and makes a poignant statement on the social class system. You'll never forget the comedic and choreographed sequences - the party and boxing scenes stand out - and it also reminds us of how love can overcome all obstacles. It's interesting to note that even though he could have made it as a talkie, Chaplin refused to do so and kept it silent. I think it was the right choice. I was very happy to see it make a major jump in the latest American Film Institute rankings of the to 100 films (from 76 to 11).

Natalie's Impressions: This movie marks my introduction to Chaplin. Although I had seen some of his shorts before watching this film, I didn't become aware of his genius until after seeing this movie, which is my favorite Chaplin film even after subsequently watching all his other films. I agree with Eric that this film is way better as a silent film than it would have been as a talkie. I think it would have lost a lot of its charm and innocence in a way. The silent aspect somehow makes the message all the more powerful and heartfelt. I would mind seeing this film jump into AFI's top ten- maybe next time.

COUNTDOWN: Just 954 movies left!

Frankenstein-1931

2009-12-16T19:26:00.000-08:00

U.S.

Length: 71 minutes

Director: James Whale

Cast: Collin Clive, Mae Clark, John Boles, Boris Karloff, Edward Van Sloan, Frederick Kerr, Dwight Frye, Lionel Belmore, Marilyn Harris

www.imdb.com/title/tt0021884/

Eric's Impressions: Though I much prefer the Mel Brooks' classic, "Young Frankenstein," I have to give this movie it's due in horror film history despite it not being all that scary. I know I'm in the minority based on all the vampire movies out there, but I always found the Frankenstein story much more interesting than the predictable blood-sucking fare. Boris Karlof is superb as the monster as is Colin Clive as Dr. Frankenstein.

Natalie's Impressions: Most important horror film ever made. Yay. Whoopie. This film reminds me why I don't like the horror genre- cheesy, pastiche, parody. I personally find it all somewhat pointless. Six years ago I had to read Shelley's book the summer before my freshman year in college. That year I learned way more about the Frankenstein phenomena than I ever cared to. My college's library had a large collection of Frankenstein, Dracula, Vampire movies. We watched this film and the many spin-offs of the Frankenstein story in several required classes so that I now not only have analyzed the literature but also the films in academic settings. None of that analysis really stuck with me, but I certainly see why this movie is included because I would agree that it is the epitome of the horror film. I also like Boris Karloff and was not so disappointed by Collin Clive.

COUNTDOWN: Just 955 movies to go!

Dracula- 1931

2009-12-16T19:17:00.000-08:00

U.S.

Length: 75 minutes

Director: Tod Browning

Cast: Bela Lugosi, Helen Chandler, David Manners, Dwight Frye, Edward van Sloan, Herbert Bunstom, Frances Dade, Joan Standing, Tod Browning, Michael Visaroff, Charles K. Gerrard

www.imdb.com/title/tt0021814/

Eric's Impressions: This was always my favorite vampire movie until I saw "Nosferatu." It's hard for me to think of anyone playing the title character better than Bela Lugosi. Who will ever forget the classic line, "Cheeldren of the naight, leesten to thaim." I've mentioned my admiration for director Tod Browning - the Tim Burton of his time - in other reviews. This movie is often credited for making the horror genre more mainstream and despite a weak ending, it's still an all-time classic.

Natalie's Impressions: The original Dracula! My expectations were perhaps too high before I saw this film. I think our society is slightly desensitized to high tech Dracula movies- at least I am. Vampire and Dracula movies were already pasé for me before I even saw my first one. I sit through each one incredibly bored, trying to find something other than the ridiculous plot to interest me. This film's acting was mildly interesting, but I knew that it would be going into it. So no surprise there. I was actually underwhelmed with the lack of dramatic climax and was not overly impressed with the use of sound or with the art direction. Maybe I was just not in the right mood when I saw this film but I think I could have died happily not ever seeing it.

COUNTDOWN: Just 956 movies to go!

Tabu- 1931

2009-12-13T16:15:00.000-08:00

U.S.

Length: 84 minutes

Director: F.W. Murnau

Cast: Anne Chevalier, Reri, Matahi, Hitu, Jean, Jules, Ah Kong

www.imdb.com/title/tt0022458/

Eric's Impressions: I probably didn't give this film a fair shake as I was so glad to be out of the Silent Era when we watched it, only to realize that it in fact was another silent film. Though the film is filled with beautiful imagery and landscapes in Bora Bora, I couldn't help but think I was just watching a tropical "Nanook of the North." With that being said, I'm a big fan of two of Murnau's other films - the previously discussed, "Nosferatu" and "The Last Laugh."

Natalie's Impressions: Of the Murnau films I have seen, this is probably my favorite, besides The Last Laugh. He was such a versatile director. He did everything from horror to comedy to drama. This film has a documentary aesthetic to it in the way it was filmed, seemingly documenting a tribe of French Polynesians. I can see how it won an Oscar for best cinematography. I can only imagine how spectacular the film could have been in color! Although no professional actors were used in this film and the names of the main characters in the film were the names of the actors, the acting was pretty good. The stoic facial expression of the chief, the desperate look of Reri, and the determined, hopeful and despairing looks that move across Matahi's face over the course of the film are what will stand out in my memory.

COUNTDOWN: Just 957 movies to go!

Le Million- 1931

2009-12-08T15:20:00.000-08:00

France

Length: 89 minutes

Director: René Clair

Cast:

www.imdb.com/title/tt0022150/

Eric's Impressions: This film packs a pretty solid 1-2 punch for director Rene Clair as he made the last entry, "A Nous La Liberte," the same year as this one. Like Natalie, I enjoyed this one much more, especially because it got so ridiculous at times that you have to applaud the filmmakers for letting it get out of hand. I need to look further into it, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Monty Python troupe listed this as one of their most influential films. The chase sequences would make Benny Hill blush and the entire cast is in on the joke as they have no problem letting their hair down to move the story along.

Natalie's Impressions: I found this Clair film to be much more entertaining than A Nous la Liberté. I laughed out loud many times, but not necessarily because of the physical comedy, but rather for the pure silliness of the whole thing. The chase scenes were excellent, especially the one scored to the sounds of a rugby game where a jacket gets tossed around like a ball in rugby. The score as a whole, in fact, was one of the strongest parts of the film, in my opinion. I thought this film had a better balance of dialogue, songs and silence than the previous film. I didn't find the songs that were used as storytelling vehicles as annoying, but rather entertaining because they were so silly.

COUNTDOWN: Just 958 movies to go!

Freedom for Us- 1931

2009-11-27T14:47:00.000-08:00

France

Length: 104 minutes

Director: René Clair

Cast: Raymond Cordy, Henri Marchand, Paul Ollivier, Andre Michaud, Rolla France, Germaine Aussey, Leon Lorin, William Burke, Jacques Shelley, Vincent Hyspa

www.imdb.com/title/tt0022599/

Eric's Impressions: Natalie refers to the charges of plagiarism by the producer of this one to Charlie Chaplin's classic, "Modern Times." If the plagiarism charge revolves around the plot of both movies being based in a factory and a conveyor belt scene then Chaplin is guilty because that's the only similarity I found between the two. The main characters/buddies are sensational each time they hit the screen together, but only average when apart. Rene Clair is an interesting filmmaker and gets even better with his next movie, "Le Million."

Natalie's Impressions: I think I only laughed out loud once during this film. Charlie Chaplin is 100 times funnier than René Clair or any of the actors in the film. I can see the similarities between the two but Chaplin somehow does everything better and funnier. I'll take Modern Times over this any day. I also didn't really care for the musical numbers. Most of the time there was sound, it was singing instead of dialogue and I am not a huge fan of musicals in the first place. One thing I did like about the film was that it didn't become preachy about the evils and fears of modernization, which many other film makers of the era were obsessed with. Instead, the film has a positive message told through comedy.

COUNTDOWN: Just 959 movies to go!

All Quiet on the Western Front- 1930

2009-11-27T14:39:00.001-08:00

U.S.

Length: 131 minutes

Director: Lewis Milestone

Cast: Louis Wolheim, Lew Ayers, John Wray, Arnold Lucy, Ben Alexander, Scott Kolk, Owen Davis Jr., Walter Rogers, William Bakewell, Russell Gleason, Richard Alexander, Harold Goodwin, Beryl Mercer

www.imdb.com/title/tt0020629/

Eric's Impressions: For all whom have ever questioned why we ever go to war, this is the movie to watch. Much like the Bob Dylan anti-war classic, "Master of War," this is a timeless creation that can relate to every war ever fought and every one that has yet to take place. It's not surprising to find out that director Lewis Milestone was a war veteran himself. It gives the film an authenticity much like Oliver Stone did with his Vietnam War tales ("Platoon" and "Born on the Fourth of July." If you're thinking about joining the military, please check this one out. Nothing is more heart-wrenching than seeing the mother of a soldier not even able to identify her own son following battle.

Natalie's Impressions: For me, one of the most tragic moments in the film is at the very beginning when the boys' teacher gives them a motivational speech about joining the army and then peer pressure exerts its force on each classmate, one after the other, as they stand up and start singing joyfully about what they are about to experience. This scene captures Remarque's sense of impending doom perfectly. This film is a rare complement to the film adaptation genre. There are so many talking points for this film. I could go on and on about the innovative technology at the dawn of sound films, the powerful message of the film so soon after WWI and right before WWII, the ironic turn of Ayer's career after making the film, the incredibly fact that German censors passed the film when it came out, even in the face of fierce Nazi opposition, and the many other tragic scenes in the film that point to the futility of war.

COUNTDOWN: Just 960 movies to go!

Little Caesar- 1930

2009-11-24T15:32:00.000-08:00

U.S.A.

Length: 79 minutes

Director: Mervyn LeRoy

Cast: Edward G. Robinson, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Glenda Farrell, William Collier Jr., Sidney Blackmer, Ralph Ince, Maurice Black, Nicholas Bela, Armand Kaliz

www.imdb.com/title/tt0021079

Eric's Impressions: I've always been a big fan of the gangster genre whether it's on the big screen ("The Godfather" series, "Goodfellas," and "Mean Streets" just to name a few) and on the small screen ("The Sopranos"). With films like this one, it's nice to see the beginnings of the genre. Edward G. Robinson is great as the main character. As we watch his speedy climb to the top of the underworld and his quicker fall, we are reminded of so many other gangster stories, but this one deserves it's just due for being one of the first.

Natalie's Impressions: This film was a welcome break from the films we have been watching previously because it is one of the first in the gang genre. Robinson is the typical gangster that rises to the top only to fall in the end because of a tragic character flaw. The story of the tragic hero is not unique but it is somewhat remarkable that this film was produced during the heart of the Great Depression. In a way, it echoes the fear that many individuals felt at the time in the face of economic ruin. In this sense, the film is a timely one for today's audiences as well.

COUNTDOWN: Just 961 movies to go!

Earth- 1930

2009-11-20T19:32:00.000-08:00

U.S.S.R.

Length: 75 minutes

Director: Aleksandr Dovzhenko

Cast: Stepan Shkurat, Semyon Svashenko, Yuliya Solntseva, Yelena Maksimova, Nikolai Nademsky

www.imdb.com/title/tt0021571/

Eric's Impressions: Ummm. Hmmm. Ummm. Hmmm. Where do I begin or better yet, where do I end this review? This is one of the more boring movies on the list and though filled with beautiful imagery, not an especially enjoyable viewing experience. Like all Russian films reviewed thus far, this one revolves around Communist propaganda with a script that was censored of some of its better scenes after viewing by the government. I will never forget the farmers peeing in the tractor and I believe I even peed myself as I fell asleep a few times watching it.

Natalie's Impressions: Now that is has been a few days since I watched this film, I am regretting not writing this review right away because I don't remember the film. It was very forgettable. I do remember the scene where the farmer pees in the tractor's radiator to get it to go because they don't have any water to put in it. And I remember the main character, Basil getting shot by the enemy group of farmers that were mad that Basil's rich group had a tractor. 75 minutes was too long. The religious theme- or rather the questioning of God's existence- added at least fifteen minutes to the beginning of the film, which chronicled the death of an elder farmer. The religious theme did add to the film and I thought the most interesting part was when Basil's father insists on a regular funeral but the towns people don't want one because they no longer trust priests. I just think it didn't need to drag on the way it did, in my opinion.

COUNTDOWN: Just 962 movies to go!

The Age of Gold-1930

2009-11-14T13:20:00.000-08:00

France

Length: 60 minutes

Director: Luis Buñuel

Cast: Gaston Modot, Lya Lys, Caridad de Lacerdesque, Max Ernst, Lionel Salem, Germaine Noizet, Josep Llorens Artigas

www.imdb.com/title/tt0021577/

Eric's Impressions: I knew this was going to be a strange film going in considering the director (Luis Bunuel) and screenwriter (Salvador Dali). When the movie started with a documentary on scorpions, my instincts were right on. I've never been a big fan of the surrealist movement, so maybe that's why I was scratching my head throughout viewing. It's definitely shocking at times and at other times just plain silly.

Natalie's Impressions: Ummm. Yeah. I don't even know where to begin with this film. I understand the whole surrealist dream scape thing going on and I get what Buñuel was trying to achieve- and I think he did achieve the effect he was aiming for- if that effect was one of disorientation, confusion, shock, discomfort, unease and disgust mixed with an unwanted sexual arousal. I experienced all of these emotions and more will watching this film. It got to the point where I wasn't surprised at what I saw. The cow on the bed, which provokes only an annoyed reaction from the bed's owner, the murder of the little boy for a minor offense, and statements like " what joy at having killed our children" become normal in this surrealist world. By the time a man resembling Jesus walks out of a building having engaged in orgies, rape, and murder of women, I was nodding my head, thinking "of course that is Jesus. Why would it be anyone else?"

COUNTDOWN: Just 963 movies to go!

The Blue Angel-1930

2009-11-14T12:50:00.001-08:00

Germany

Length: 99 minutes

Director: Josef von Sternberg

Cast: Emil Jannings, Marlene Dietrich, Kurt Gerron, Rosa Valetti, Hans Albers, Rolf Muller, Roland Varno, Carl Balthaus, Charles Puffy, Gerhard Bienart, Wilhelm Diegelmann

www.imdb.com/title/tt0020697/

Eric's Impressions: This is a heartbreaking story centering around the life of Professor Immanuel Rath, played masterfully by Emil Jannings. Falling in love spins his life out of control. The object of his affections is Lola, played by screen legend Marlene Dietrich. As Jannings hooks up with Lola's traveling show, and in turn her, a creepy clown starts following him around without ever uttering a word. Think of the clown from Stephen King's "It" before he loses it. I was disturbed by his sad, pathetic presence not realizing that the director was foreshadowing the fate of the Professor with him. This is a sad movie without a happy ending like so many of the American films of this time period.

Natalie's Impressions: Emil Jannings is far and away the star of this film. Dietrich became famous in Hollywood with Sternberg after this film. This film put her on the map, but Jannings' performance is the most memorable for me. He channels the desperate love-lorn old man so well. He plunges himself into the role in a way that is so completely devastating. He plays with the viewers emotions throughout the course of the film. At the beginning he is not a likeable character. He becomes more likeable as he falls in love but at the same time the viewer feels sympathy for him as the inevitable downfall of his character looms ahead. By the end, he tries to regain some of his dignity by leaving the Blue Angel and returning to the college, thus taking charge of his own life again. But it is too late; he dies sitting at his old desk in the classroom in which he once taught. A true tour d'force by Jannings.

COUNTDOWN: Just 964 movies to go!

Pandora's Box- 1929

2009-11-14T12:49:00.000-08:00

Germany

Length: 97 minutes

Director: Georg Wilhelm Pabst

Cast: Louise Brooks, Fritz Kortner, Francis Lederer, Carl Goetz, Alice Roberts, Gustav Diessl

www.imdb.com/title/tt0018737/

Eric's Impressions: As you will gather from Natalie's review I did have a mini-crush on the lead actress Louise Brooks after watching this movie - that's what you get for leaving me behind in New York as you lived in China for the better part of the year. Hopefully Brooks doesn't ruin our relationship, but her character destroys all who cross her path and fight for her affection. Everyone falls for her playful sexuality, including an unheard of for its time lesbian admirer, and their lives are never for the better after meeting her. Thank god she met her match in the end and Natalie and I can live happily ever after.

Natalie's Impressions: I saw this film after Eric and I must admit that my opinion of the acting was somewhat affected by the fact that Eric told me immediately after watching the film that he wanted to go to bed with Louise Brooks, that she was the most seductive and beautiful piece of ass ever to hit the silent screen, etc. I was living on the other side of the world at this time so there wasn't much either of us could do with our sexual frustration so I just sat down and watched the film. And I admit, Brooks is quite stunning. Her character is wonderfully rich and she plays it up perfectly. After seeing the film, I was even more impressed with her acting when I read that no expressionist makeup or other tricks were used to dramatize her performance. It is honest and raw and very powerful.

COUNTDOWN: Just 965 movies to go!

The Man with the Movie Camera- 1929

2009-11-14T12:46:00.001-08:00

U.S.S.R.

Length: 80 minutes

Director: Dziga Vertov

www.imdb.com/title/tt0019760/

Eric's Impressions: Just the title implies that this is a movie for people who love to get behind the camera and tell a story. Vertov uses almost every filmmaker trick throughout the picture. The movie makes you feel like you're watching unrehearsed footage as the camera catches everything in its path to drive home the central point - there is no limit to what one can do with the camera. Of course like all Soviet films of the time, there is plenty of propaganda underneath the surface, but if you're able to dismiss it for what it is, you're left with an interesting piece of visual art.

Natalie's Impressions: While the Soviet propaganda of this film is impossible to escape, it was still an interesting film to watch, simply because of the scope of the project. It is a film and cinematography study in its own right. Vertov shows the range of techniques a cinematographer has it his/her disposal through an exposition of such tricks like reverse zooms, slow motion, animation and split screens. Not bad for 1929 Soviet Russia. It is a treatise on documentary film making or what Vertov called "life caught unawares." The film chronicles a day in the life of a city. The editing is as brilliant as the filming itself. Through the editing, the viewer is presented with a non-linear narrative. Although the film only depicts one day, the camera captures all stages of life so that it feels like you are watching a lifetime squeezed into 80 minutes.

COUNTDOWN: Just 966 movies to go!

Blackmail- 1929

2009-11-08T14:51:00.000-08:00

U.K. Length: 96 minutes
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Cast: Anny Ondra, Sara Allgood, Charles Paton, John Longden, Donald Calthrop, Cyril Ritchard, Hannah Jones, Harvey Braban, Sergeant Bishop
www.imdb.com/title/tt0019702

Eric's Impressions: It's not a surprise that Alfred Hitchcock probably has more films on this list than any other director. His films are never boring with countless plot twists usually revolving around murder. This is no exception and though this is one of his earliest, it's right up there with many of his later films. I read that Hitchcock had shot the film as a silent picture, but then went back and re shot it with sound. He pulls no punches here and has no problem casting a female as the murderer even if it was in self-defense. Note that Hitchcock's weapon of choice is often the knife and I think he feels that it's impossible for the person wielding it to escape his/her own passion and emotion when they finally do use it

Natalie's Impressions: Anny Ondra's performance fits right in with the other blonde Hitchcock girls that came after her. Her story is also very indicative of future storyline that feature violence against women. Always the artistic filmmaker, Hitchcock never shows us those rape or murder scenes. They are alluded to or covered up or only heard and not seen. This film is a talkie and the rape scene is one in which that latter technique is used to great effect. The dead rapist's hand protruding from the bed sheets is sufficiently haunting for the female protagonist as well as for the viewer. The rapist is not the only character who pulls off a performance of a character you love to hate. The man thought to be the murderer is as slimy as they come with the oily smile and smooth talk. Lucky for Anny's character, her boyfriend the policeman is wittier and quicker than the blackmailing criminal!

COUNTDOWN: Just 967 movies to go!

Storm Over Asia- 1928

2009-11-08T14:43:00.000-08:00

U.S.S.R.
Length: 93 minutes
Director: Vsevolod Pudovkin
Cast: Valery Inkijinoff, I. Dedintsev, Aleksandr Chistyakov, Viktor Tsoppi, Boris Barnet, Anel Sudakevich
www.imdb.com/title/tt0019286/

Eric's Impressions: I remember saying to Natalie when we watched this that it looked like a documentary in the form of something like "Nanook of the North," so much so that it felt like it was done by the same filmmaker. It wasn't a documentary, nor was it directed by the same person, but it was still visually perplexing at times. It was hard not to fall asleep as the story was action less throughout, but it did recover somewhat with a thrilling conclusion.

Natalie's Impressions: This film was like watching Nanook of the North in Asia. The film is not a pure documentary like Nanook of the North was but it did have elements of that genre. The aesthetic of this film was also very similar to the arctic documentary. If not for the communist propaganda overtones, it could be mistaken for that film. The Soviet Union certainly has a preachy presence in this film. The depiction of the "evil capitalists" is actually quite amusing because, although a silent film, the viewer has no doubt who these entrepreneurs are. We are given not so subtle hints through the music, the smarmy mannerisms of the actors, their demeanor, and their costumes, not to mention the basic storyline, which paints the Mongols as innocent and good.

COUNTDOWN: Just 967 movies to go!

Steamboat Bill, Jr.- 1928

2009-10-27T17:59:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 71 minutes

Director: Charles Reisner, Buster Keaton

Cast: Buster Keaton, Tom McGuire, Ernest Torrence, Tom Lewis, Marion Byron

www.imdb.com/title/tt0019421/

Eric's Impressions: Another enjoyable film from Keaton and sadly the last one in the book to review. It has all the usual Keaton film characteristics: intense stunts and action sequences, a forbidden love story and an unexpected hero. Like Chaplin, Keaton should not just be applauded for his acting and comedic talents, but for his ability to convey the message of the storyline through his directing skills.

Natalie's Impressions: This is the last Keaton film included in the book and one of the first of his that I saw. I honestly don't remember much of it now that I have seen his other films. Nothing stands out as being unique to this film that his other films didn't have. But that doesn't mean it is not a good film. I do remember being very entertained by it and impressed by some of the stunts, but then again, all Keaton films have this effect.

COUNTDOWN: Just 968 movies to go!

The Passion of Joan of Arc- 1928

2009-10-27T17:52:00.000-07:00

France

Length: 110 minutes

Director: Carl Theodore Dreyer

Cast: Renee Falconetti, Eugene Silvain, Andre Berley, Maurice Schutz, Sntonin Artaud, Michel Simon, Luis Ravet, Leon Larive, Jaques Arnna, Armand Lurville, Alexandre Mihalesco, Jean d'Yd

www.imdb.com/title/tt0019254/

Eric's Impressions: Meryl Streep has nothing on Renee Falconetti. As the title character, Falconetti gives one of the silver screen's all-time most memorable performances. I was shocked to find out that the actress never made another film. Maybe she thought she could never top this performance or maybe she just wanted her career to symbolically go up in flames like Joan of Arc. I especially found interesting Dreyer's use of the camera in the scenes with the court deciding Joan's fate as he slowly panned to each member for reactions to what the heroine was telling them as she desperately fought for her life.

Natalie's Impressions: Although I am not sure I would jump to the conclusion that Falconetti's performance in this film is the greatest of any female actress of all time, as many have done, I do believe it is an extraordinary performance. I really liked how most of the dialogue that was included as subtitles in the film was one sided. It was mostly her words as they were recorded so many years ago. It was authentic, realistic and it didn't add a lot of superfluous other dialogue from the other characters to take away from Joan as the central character. It is a shame she never made another film because she sure had a talent to convey a wide range of emotions just using her eyes, which is not something many contemporary actors can accomplish.

COUNTDOWN: Just 969 movies to go!

An Andalusian Dog- 1928

2009-10-27T17:45:00.000-07:00

France

Length: 16 minutes

Director: Luis Buñuel

Cast: Pierre Batcheff, Simone Marueil, Luis Buñuel, Salvador Dalí

www.imdb.com/title/tt0020530/

Eric's Impressions: Ever since hearing the Pixies song about this movie ("Debaser" off of Doolittle), I've wanted to see this one. The song is weird and the film is even weirder, but I like both. It's not a surprise the movie is strange considering Salvador Dali was involved. Of course the imagery of a razor slicing up an eyeball is probably the most memorable sequence in the entire movie. The film is just 16 minutes long which is more than enough time for the filmmaker to haunt, disturb and confuse you to the point where the only option is to watch it over again under the influence of marijuana, acid or any other mind-bending drugs on your person.

Natalie's Impressions: This is the first Buñuel film included in the book. This short film was Buñuel's directorial debut. He co-wrote the screenplay with Dalí, whose influence is very prevalent in this surrealist film that is famous for the image of a razor slicing open an eyeball. The dream-like montage of images that make up the film seem totally unrelated and disconnected, but like Dalí's paintings, they are supposed to represent the chaos of the dream world and the flow of the subconscious. It is interesting to see Dalí as an actor in the film. Such a prolific figure in the visual art world is rarely seen in other forms of art and media.

COUNTDOWN: Just 970 movies to go!

The Kid Brother- 1927

2009-10-27T17:38:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 84 minutes

Director: J.A. Howe, Ted Wilde

Cast: Harold Lloyd, Jobyna Ralston, Walter James, Leo Willis, Olin Francis, Eddie Boland, Frank Lanning, Constantine Romanoff, Ralph Yearsley

www.imdb.com/title/tt0018051/

Eric's Impressions: If Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton had a baby it would be Harold Lloyd. Like those two, Lloyd was a comedic genius and able to build story lines around action sequences that would give any of today's stars a run for their money. We've seen the tale before where the youngest brother fights for the affection of his hard-to-please father and older brothers before saving the day and the family in the end. Lloyd is that guy and he falls in love as well. It's a very predictable movie, but it's worth checking out for the dangerous stunts.

Natalie's Impressions: I had never heard of Harold Lloyd until recently. A friend of mine is a big fan and actually prefers him to Keaton and Chaplin. He lent me a DVD of several of his films and when I noticed that this movie was included in the book, I watched it. It is the only Lloyd film included as opposed to the several Chaplin and Keaton films included. Unlike these two, Lloyd didn't direct or write the films he stared in. His physical comedy is good and the choreography is similar to Keaton's frequent chase sequences in his films. The story line of this film is also very similar to those of the Chaplin and Keaton films.

COUNTDOWN: Just 971 movies to go!

The Jazz Singer-1927

2009-10-19T15:23:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 88 minutes

Director: Alan Crosland

Cast: Al Jolson, May McAvoy, Warner Oland, Eugenie Besserer, Otto Lederer, Bobby Gordon, Richard Tucker

www.imdb.com/title/tt0018037/

Eric's Impressions: I might be the only film buff to ever admit this, but I much prefer the 1980 Neil Diamond version. Okay, so the original revolutionized the history of cinema as being the first feature-length sound movie, but did it have Diamond singing "America," "Love on the Rocks," and "Hello Again?" Also, though I enjoy blatant racism and blackface as much as the next guy (hint: sarcasm), I found the original boring despite a decent performance by star Al Jolson. Give me Diamond as the disappointing son and Laurence Olivier as the disappointed father any day. Note: Diamond and Olivier won Worst Actor and Worst Supporting Actor at the Golden Raspberry Awards for their performances.

Natalie's Impressions: I had a few issues with this film that are not necessarily the film's fault but rather the fact that it was made when it was. The fact that it was the first talkie accounts for the odd moments of dialogue that puncture the mostly silent picture. It seems to be trying to be something it is not in other ways as well. Like many silent films that came before it, I felt like it was a little preachy at times. I did like the acting though. Al Jolson was pretty good but I really liked the Cantor and his wife. I wasn't so crazy about the musical numbers- but then again I am not generally a fan of musicals. The movie is included in the book for an obvious reason- it even won an Oscar for being a talking picture. But I am not sure that the film has anything else really separating it from other films that makes it special.

COUNTDOWN: Just 972 movies to go!

October-1927

2009-10-19T15:05:00.000-07:00

U.S.S.R.

Length: 95 minutes

Director: Grigori Aleksandrov, Sergei M. Eisenstein

Cast: Vladimir Popov, Vasili Nikandrov, Layaschenko Chibisov, Boris Livanov, Mikholyev, Smelsky, Eduard Tisse

www.imdb.com/title/tt0018217

Eric's Impressions: It would be foolish to pass this off as just another Eisenstein propaganda - which it is - because it's much more. The revolutionary filmmaker attempts to recreate the Bolshevik victory 10 years after the fact and he does such a good job of pulling it off that you swear at times he's using actual documentary footage. This movie has all the usual Eisenstein film tricks - quick scene cuts, haunting imagery and dark subject matter. It's a heart-pounding ride that you won't soon forget and it's disappointing to learn that it's the last of his films we'll review in this book.

Natalie's Impressions: The last of the Eisenstein movies included in this book is typical soviet propaganda fare like his other films but it is also equally striking in its imagery. This film is my least favorite of his that I have seen because it is not as cohesive. It feels as though he is trying so hard to outdo himself, spending tons of money, trying to recreate events just exactly how they happened at the expense of a good solid plot with character development. I didn't get really drawn into the story because it was hard to follow but as usual, there were some very memorable scenes that bear the Eisenstein signature.

COUNTDOWN: Just 973 movies to go!

The Unknown-1927

2009-10-19T15:03:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 65 minutes

Director: Tod Browning

Cast: Lon Chaney, Norman Kerry, Joan Crawford, Nick de Ruiz, John George, Frank Lanning, Polly Moran

www.imdb.com/title/tt0018528/

Eric's Impressions: For contemporary film goers, director Tod Browning was the Tim Burton of his time (same initials). They both love to show us the trials and tribulations of humans regarded as curiosities or monstrosities - in other words - freaks. Browning even made a film with the title "Freaks" and Burton is never afraid to make movies centered around them ("Edward Scissorhands"). Team up Browning with Lon Chaney and you've got cinematic gold. Chaney's "disabled" character eats and drinks with his feet, loves with his big heart and steals the entire movie both literally and figuratively. The twisted ending promises to disturb you, but you'll still want to watch this masterpiece again and again.

Natalie's Impressions: It was kind of weird seeing Joan Crawford in this early role. She is hardly recognizable at such a young age. But Lon Chaney steals the show. The physical ordeal he must have gone through having his arms bound is almost as impressive as the dexterity of his feet. The way he uses his feet looks so natural that sometimes I thought his feet were his hands. The way he moves, holds a cigarette, eats, throws knives is a skill I have yet to see in any other actor, including Daniel Day Lewis. I have not yet seen Browning's other films so I didn't really know what to expect. I had heard all sorts of weird things about Freaks and so I got squeamish during the scene where one of the characters has each arm attached to ropes being pulled by horses in opposite directions. In an ironic twist, this character isn't the unfortunate one, but rather the protagonist who gets trampled by the horse.

COUNTDOWN: Just 974 movies to go!

The General-1927

2009-10-12T15:07:00.000-07:00

U.S.A.

Length: 75 minutes

Director: Buster Keaton, Clyde Bruckman

Cast: Buster Keaton, Marion Mack, Charles Smith, Richard Allen, Glen Cavender, Jim Farley, Tom Nawn, Frederick Vroom, Joe Keaton, Mike Donlin

www.imdb.com/title/tt0017925/

Eric's Impressions: Another Keaton classic. Watching him on screen never gets old. Considered by many his greatest work, "The General" truly is one of the funniest films of all-time. With the Civil War as the setting for the story, Keaton's hero shows us the humility of man while making us laugh at our own foibles. The reviewer in the book argues that this is the best Civil War movie ever made, but I'll need a little more time to digest that thought with my personal favorite still being "Glory."

Natalie's Impressions: This was the first Keaton film I ever saw. This was about three years ago. Now that I am more familiar with his work, I think it is still my favorite and most impressive in terms of physical comedy, although the waterfall scene in Our Hospitality is truly amazing. I can see why this was his most well known picture. The plot is strong, the character development is complex, the comedy is non-stop and even the historical references are precise.

COUNTDOWN: Just 975 movies to go!

Metropolis-1927

2009-10-02T17:52:00.000-07:00

Germany

Length: 120 minutes

Director: Fritz Lang

Cast: Alfred Abel, Gustav Frohlich, Brigitte Helm, Rudolf Klein-Rogge, Fritz Rasp, Theodor Loos, Heinrich George

www.imdb.com/title/tt0017136/

Eric's Impressions: The first science fiction epic was definitely ahead of its time and continues to influence the genre to this day. The sets are elaborate and it's always interesting to see how people predict what the world will look like in the future. I've also been noticing a growing pattern in early cinema of casting an overly-dramatic actor in the male lead. I'm not sure if this occurs because of the direction of the director or because talent-less pretty boys are cast in the lead - that never happens today. The lead female actress (Helm) makes up for it with her dual roles as the saint/robot along with the fascinating mad scientist Rotwang (Klein-Rogge).

Natalie's Impressions: One the one hand, I feel overwhelmed by how much there is to say about this film. On the hand, it has all been said before precisely because this is such an influential film from a legendary director. There are many contradictions surrounding the film, but the strongest and most lasting impression I have of this film is the apparent dedication, passion and vision of Lang when he made the film. It is evident in every second of the film. Every scene is so carefully constructed and thought out, not to mention visually breathtaking. Although I do agree with Lang on one level that the film was "simplistic and naive," (a comment he made years after the film was made), I think he should almost be forgiven even if it was a little bit, simply because it was one of his earliest films and it seemed to be a true portrait of who Lang was at the time. It feels very authentic to me, even though the biblical allusions were annoying and could have been easily omitted without seriously compromising the film's message.

COUNTDOWN: Just 977 movies to go!

The Gold Rush-1925

2009-09-30T17:39:00.000-07:00

U.S.A.

Length: 72 minutes

Director: Charles Chaplin

Cast: Charles Chaplin, Mack Swain, Tom Murray, Henry Bergman, Malcolm Waite, Georgia Hale

www.imdb.com/title/tt0015864/

Eric's Impressions: Another masterpiece by the greatest film director/producer/writer/actor of the first half of the 20th century and early film pioneer, Chaplin delivers cinematic gold here, no pun intended. Though I prefer "City Lights," I can understand why Chaplin most wanted to be remembered for this one because it's a history lesson, love story, statement on mankind and belly-aching comedy all rolled up into one. It features some of Chaplin's greatest sequences and shows that a decade into his American film career, he was really hitting his stride across the board in all of his artistic pursuits.

Natalie's Impressions: Only Chaplin can make high comedy out of starvation and greed. Whether or not this is a right and noble ability, I am not going to say, but apparently Chaplin thought it was because he declared this film was the one by which he most wished to be remembered. But I do believe it takes a certain amount of talent, confidence and dedication to even be comically inspired by something as devastating as the Donner Party disaster. Perhaps the most impressive aspect of this film, besides the famous boot cooking and dancing bread rolls, is the sheer elaborateness of the sets and camera work. The studio recreation of the Sierra Nevadas looks as real as the actual mountains, both of which are featured in the film. Although not my absolute favorite Chaplin picture, I would happily watch it over and over again.

COUNTDOWN: Just 978 movies to go!

The Battleship Potemkin-1925

2009-09-30T17:32:00.000-07:00

U.S.S.R

Length: 75 minutes

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein, Grigori Aleksandrov

Cast: Aleksandr Antonov, Vladimir Barsky, Grigori Aleksandrov, Mikhail Gomorov, Ivan Bobrov, Beatrice Vitoldi, N. Poltavseva, Julia Eisenstein

www.imdb.com/title/tt0015648/

Eric's Impressions: One of the most talked-about films ever made, this one will make you think as it equally confuses at the same time. Like most of Eisenstein's films, there's a lot of propaganda disguised as a storyline with frantic cuts and edits. The imagery can be haunting at times, especially the sequence with the baby carriage on the steps. It was so controversial at the time it came out that it was banned around the world. Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Gobbels famously said, "a marvellous film without equal in the cinema ... anyone who had no firm political conviction could become a Bolshevik after seeing the film." You will never forget this movie experience.

Natalie's Impressions: If one were to cut up this film into individual freeze-frames and assemble them in a random order, it would be one of the most disturbing, confusing and memorable photographic displays. But watching the film from beginning to end is even more memorable and disturbing because an emotional story is built behind those images that the viewer comes to understand (maybe not understand, but comprehend why they are there). The techniques and the unique aesthetic that Eisenstein brings to the screen in all of his films, as well as the ideological storm this film created makes it one of the most important and influential films not just in Western culture, but globally.

COUNTDOWN: Just 979 movies to go!

The Phantom of the Opera-1925

2009-09-30T17:25:00.000-07:00

U.S.A.

Length: 93 minutes

Director: Rupert Julian, Lon Chaney

Cast: Lon Chaney, Mary Philbin, Norman Kerry, Arthur Edmund Carewe, Gibson Gowland, John St. Polis, Snitz Edwards

www.imdb.com/title/tt0016220

Eric's Impressions: The uglier the character, the better Lon Chaney captures his essence. Chaney, known as "The Man of a Thousand Faces," never turned down a role because a character was too dark or too scary for the screen. He is brilliant as the evil Phantom, while the rest of the film's cast is below average. This is a story that has been retold over and over again, but no version is quite as creepy as this one. Though it might have a lot to do with it being silent, much credit should be given to Chaney.

Natalie's Impressions: As far as 1920s silent films go, this one is of average length, however, I found myself wishing it was much shorter while watching it. The pace, plot and overall structure of the film is weak and very slow. Sure, Lon Chaney gives a haunting great performance but it just didn't really do much for me. I am not a major fan of the story and I didn't feel like this film had anything that all the versions that came after it didn't have. Plus, I I think that if this was the first Phantom movie I had ever seen, I would have a slightly more favorable opinion. But because it was the first silent film to capture the melodramatic story, I see why it was included.

COUNTDOWN: Just 980 movies to go!

Seven Chances- 1925

2009-09-30T17:13:00.000-07:00

U.S.A.

Length: 56 minutes

Director: Buster Keaton

Cast: Buster Keaton, T. Roy Barnes, Snitz Edwards, Ruth Dwyer, Frances Raymond, Erwin Connelly, Jules Cowles

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0016332/

Eric's Impressions: Much like his contemporary Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton is best remembered for his comedic antics on screen. Especially in action sequences, the genius of each is on full display. Another common trait in many of their films that is sometimes missed is that these comedies actually have feelings. This movie fits that mold with crazy and unnerving gags intermixed with a beautiful love story. You might not laugh as loudly as you do watching his other movies, but your appreciation of all that Keaton brings to the screen will grow even deeper.

Natalie's Impressions: This is the only Keaton film I have seen where I did not laugh from beginning to end. In fact, the first half of the film was not really funny at all. I don't even know if it was supposed to be funny. The premise of the film is certainly amusing but the plot didn't really thicken and climax until the end, which had more scenes with Keaton doing crazy physical stunts, like all his other films. The boulder-dodging scene is very memorable although I have to think they either sped up the camera to make it seem like he was really running that fast and that they didn't use real boulders made of rock. Either way, it was still a scene that required great skill.

COUNTDOWN: Just 981 movies to go!

The Last Laugh- 1924

2009-09-26T16:31:00.000-07:00

Germany

Length: 77 minutes

Director: F.W. Murnau

Cast: Emil Jannings, Maly Delschaft, Max Hiller, Emilie Kurz, Georg John, Emmy Wyda, Olaf Storm, Herman Vallentin

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0015064/

Eric's Impressions: Despite the feel-good ending that doesn't fit with the rest of the film, this is still a winner. Emil Jannings as the old doorman that gets demoted is brilliant. He makes the director's decision to not have subtitles work because his physical acting is first-rate with each body movement helping to tell the story. Murnau takes some chances, especially with the camera's first-person perspective of drunkenness. The ending would've worked much better if it had just been a dream, but it does succeed in making you feel happy for what happens to the story's hero.

Natalie's Impressions: The cinematography and the acting make this film a classic. Murnau's take on an interesting story line is well crafted- although the ending is improbable and doesn't fit with the rest of the film. I prefer the ending because it is a feel-good, happy ending while much of the rest of the film is very, very depressing. Some of my favorite scenes exemplified both the great acting of Jannings and the cinematography. The first scene of the movie filmed in the rain and the scene in the hotel bathroom where Jannings' character gives a cigar to the attendant are, in my opinion, the most memorable.

COUNTDOWN: Just 982 movies to go!

Stachka-1924

2009-09-23T19:00:00.000-07:00

U.S.S.R.

Length: 82 minutes

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein

Cast: Grigori Aleksandrov, Aleksandr Antonov, Yudif Glizer, Mikhail Gomorov, I. Ivanov, Ivan Klyukvin, Anatoli Kuznetsov, M. Mamin, Maksim Shtraukh, Vladimir Uralsky, Vera Yanukova, Boris Yurtsev

www.imdb.com/title/0015361/

Eric's Impressions: This is film on speed and if you blink even once you might miss something. Director Sergei M. Eisenstein has plenty of entries in the book and though I probably won't end up ranking any of them very high on my all-time favorite movie list it's hard not to admire such a visionary filmmaker. Part dramas, part political propaganda statements, his films make you think and they're never dull. If you've got a weak stomach, be prepared because P.E.T.A sure would've been protesting this movie when it hit theaters 85 years ago.

Natalie's Impressions: This is the first Eisenstein film in the book, followed by The Battleship Potemkin, made in 1925 and October, made in 1927. It was the first of his films I saw and although it didn't leave the same impression as Battleship, the montages in this film are as memorable, especially the one at the end with juxtaposition of animal slaughter with human slaughter, which is something Eisenstein does again to great effect in October. It is as if seeing the slaughter of animals is the only way to get the necessary reaction to human slaughter. The effect is very disturbing because the animal slaughter is almost more frightening and shocking than the human slaughter.

COUNTDOWN: Just 983 movies to go!

The Thief of Bagdad-1924

2009-09-23T18:51:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 155 minutes

Director: Raoul Walsh

Cast: Douglas Fairbanks, Snitz Edwards, Charles Belcher, Julanne Johnson, Sojin, Anna May Wong, Brandon Hurst, Noble Johnson, Tote Du Crow

www.imdb.com/title/0015400/

Eric's Impressions: I'm not sure star Douglas Fairbanks meant to have his character come across so silly on the screen, but if he did, bravo. Fairbanks played the part as if he was a ballerina trapped in a theater production that just so happen to have some cameras rolling to produce the most expensive film of its time. Though most of the sets were amazing, some just looked ridiculous, but I shouldn't pile on the filmmakers as it was made in 1924. The first half was much more enjoyable because it wasn't so serious, but a love story overtook the fun as the action progressed.

Natalie's Impressions: This is the first Fairbanks movie I have ever seen. Because of this movie, I will forever associate Fairbanks with a monkey. Or maybe an orangutan. Not only does he move like an ape, he has these very silly and mischievous facial expressions. His movements are very large, almost as if he was a theater actor on a stage, trying to reach out to an audience in the last row. The little pumping hand gesture he does repeatedly is equally memorable- I won't say any more about that. You will just have to see the movie to fully appreciate it. The film as a whole starts out really strong and has a lighthearted feel to it and then it gets very serious and not as entertaining, although the sets used throughout the movie are enough to make your jaw drop considering it was made in 1924. The set designer, William Cameron Menzies, created the largest movie set in Hollywood history with his six-and-a-half-acre Bagdad set.

COUNTDOWN: Just 984 movies to go!

La Roue (The Wheel)-1923

2009-09-07T13:03:00.000-07:00

France

Length: 273 minutes

Director: Abel Gance

Cast: Severin-Mars, Ivy Close, Gabriel de Gravone, Pierre Magnier, Gil Clary, Max Maxudian, Georges Terof

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0014417/

Eric's Impressions: This movie was just a bit too long and boring throughout, but still a visual treat with some amazing acting performances. It was hard to get past the disturbing Oedipus Rex storyline with father and son battling for the love of the adopted female lead. The few ups and many downs in the life of the railman (played masterfully by Severin-Mars) carry the storyline and you can't help but feel sorry for how pathetic his plight is. We must admit that we didn't watch this all in one setting and we suggest you don't either.

Natalie's Impressions: Even though I thought this film was an hour too long (the last hour and a half could have been condensed into 15 minutes) it was still an incredible film. If there had been acting awards in 1923 Severin-Mars would have won them all. As annoying as his character became near the end of the film, it is impossible to ignore his talent. Apart from a unique story line and the rather scandalous treatment even by today's standards, of the relationship between Elie, Norma and Sisif, I thought Gance pushed the wheel metaphor in the viewer's face too much. I also thought Gance was trying to show off his intellect with the Greek mythological references, superimposed images and excessive quick cuts between scenes but fortunately none of this took away from the great acting.

COUNTDOWN: Just 985 movies to go!

Sherlock, Jr.- 1924

2009-09-05T18:13:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 44 minutes

Director: Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle, Buster Keaton

Cast: Buster Keaton, Kathryn McGuire, Joe Keaton, Erwin Connelly, Ward Crane

www.imdb.com/title/tt0015324/

Eric's Impressions: It was fun watching Keaton films back-to-back and this one is my new favorite slightly over "The General." Keaton brilliantly mixes reality with illusion and the comedic timing has the viewer in stitches throughout. I love the entire "mimic the criminal" gag and I can't imagine just what went into the filming of the motorcycle handlebar ride. Knowing how much of a perfectionist Keaton was, the only conclusion is that the whole thing took a ton of time to get just right. Only 44 minutes long, the film never misses a beat and the influence it has had on future filmmakers can't be denied.

Natalie's Impressions: This short little film is probably my favorite of the Keaton films that I have seen. A few months ago I saw Woody Allen's The Purple Rose of Cairo, before watching Keaton's film that was ostensibly the inspiration for Allen's film. I remember being so impressed with what I thought was the originality of Cairo's plot but now that I have seen Keaton's film, which was one of the first films to play with the idea of the illusion of reality in film mixing with real life, I have a new appreciation for Keaton's influence on generations of film makers.

COUNTDOWN: Just 986 movies to go!

Our Hospitality-1923

2009-09-05T18:03:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 74 minutes

Director: John G. Blystone, Buster Keaton

Cast: Joe Roberts, Ralph Bushman, Craig Ward, Monte Collins, Joe Keaton, Kitty Bradbury, Buster Keaton Jr., Buster Keaton, Natalie Talmadge

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0014341/

Eric's Impressions: The Keaton-Chaplin comparisons will never die as these two comedic and cinematic pioneers were constantly one-upping each other throughout the silent era. I will admit that I have always preferred Chaplin and probably always will, but as of late, my appreciation of Keaton's genius grows with each new viewing of his works. In this movie, the action in the bicycle and train sequences - all performed by Keaton himself - stand right up there with anything stunt legends like Jackie Chan have done on film. The storyline of feuding families works, but it's the antics of Keaton that make you want to watch his movies over and over.

Natalie's Impressions: Whether Keaton is rescuing a damsel in distress from plunging to the death over a waterfall or trying to escape his murderous hosts while simultaneously wooing his love interest, his facial expression characteristically remains stoic, in contrast to fellow physical comedy actor Charlie Chaplin. It is undeniably impressive that Keaton performed all his own stunts for all his films, even breaking his neck during the making of Sherlock, Jr. but what I find even more unique is the fact that his facial expression never- and I mean never- changes. He might raise an eye brow or furrow his brows once in a while but the mouth is forever frozen in a straight line even when he is head over heels in love. He is truly one of a kind.

COUNTDOWN: Just 987 movies to go!

Foolish Wives- 1923

2009-08-30T19:13:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 117 minutes

Director: Erich von Stroheim

Cast: Erich von Stroheim, Miss DuPont, Maude George, Mae Busch, Rudolph Christians, Dale Fuller, Al Edmundsen, Malvina Polo, Cesare Gravina

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013140/

Eric's Impressions: Though this film nearly put me to sleep throughout with a predictable plot and drawn-out story, this is a must-see due to the performance of director/star Erich von Stroheim. Popularly known as "The Man You Loved To Hate," von Stroheim is a tour-de-force as the sinister Count Karamzin, who manipulates all that cross his path, especially an American damsel in distress. I guess knocking the film for its originality is a bit harsh as it did come out in 1923 and maybe it was the films that came after that were copying.

Natalie's Impressions: This film has a short version and a long version. According to our book the film is 85 minutes but the version we saw was an unedited 117 minutes long. I would have much preferred the shorter version because it took about 75 minutes for the film to get interesting. The pace picked up for the last half hour and was interesting in that I didn't know how the film was going to end. The ending was not terribly surprising but the plot had an unexpected twist that kept me watching to see how it would play out. The plot is somewhat boring but von Stroheim is a superb villain and every moment he is on the screen is entertaining.

COUNTDOWN: Just 988 movies to go!

Haxan: Witchcraft Through The Ages - 1923

2009-08-29T21:16:00.000-07:00

Denmark/Sweden

Length: 87 minutes

Director: Benjamin Christensen

Cast: Elisabeth Christensen, Astrid Holm, Karen Winther, Maren Pedersen, Ella La Cour, Emmy Schonfeld, Kate Fabian, Oscar Stribolt

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013257/

Eric's Impressions: To start off, this is one of the strangest films you will ever see. We didn't know what to make of it for the first half-hour as we were so throughly confused. Now I know film purists will get angry at what we did next, but so be it as this is our blog and our rules. On the DVD we rented from Netflix was a condensed version of the film that shortened it by about 10 minutes, so no big deal. The coolest thing about this version from the late 1960s was that it was narrated by none other than William S. Burroughs and also featured a jazzy score. We started the movie over again and now I couldn't stop laughing because of his low-growling voice along with the the cheesy jazz score set to stories of witches, grave robbers and the devil. Watching nuns kiss the bent over ass of Satan in one scene is fascinating in itself, but add in Burroughs talking over it and jazz music is pure movie magic. This horror/documentary from Denmark is completely original and that's something that should be applauded in contrast to the formulaic American-directed fare of the time.

Natalie's Impressions: While maybe not the weirdest film I have ever seen, it definitely is among the top five and I am sure before we are finished with this book of 1,001 movies, I will have seen other films that give this one a run for its money. The 1968 version that we saw was even more quirky primarily because of the ill-fitting jazz music score that made watching this odd film an even more discombobulating experience. To top it all off of course was Burroughs coming in at odd times not only to narrate but to subtly add his own interpretation of the events unfolding on the screen. As if the viewer needed more explanation of what was happening, Burroughs helpfully tells us at one point that what we were seeing were witches "kissing the ass of the devil." Amen to that.

COUNTDOWN: Just 989 movies to go!

Nosferatu, A Symphony of Terror - 1922

2009-08-29T20:57:00.000-07:00

Germany

Length: 94 minutes

Director: F.W. Murau

Cast: Max Schreck, Alexander Granach, Greta Schroder, Gustav von Wangenheim

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013442/

Eric's Impressions: Not only is this the best horror film ever made, but for me it ranks right up there with any movie from any genre. I'm not one to get creeped out rather easily, but this one still wakes me up in the middle of the night. We've seen the Dracula story portrayed on the big screen over and over again, but director F.W. Murnau's vision is completely unique. Max Schreck is unforgettable as the central character/villain Count Orlok. Legend has that Schreck got so into the role that mishaps and strange oddities, including a few deaths, occurred during shooting for which he was allegedly responsible. If you like the back story, make sure to rent the wonderful, "Shadow of the Vampire (2000)," about the making of "Nosferatu" starring Willem Dafoe (Schreck) and John Malkovich (Murnau). Just writing about "Nosferatu" makes me want to go watch it again right now.

Natalie's Impressions: Having seen several other Dracula movies since I first saw this film, I have come to the conclusion that no one is quite as eerie and unlikable as Max Schreck playing the part of Count Orlok. The make-up, although primitive was used expertly on Schreck's face and hands, the latter of which are very haunting. More recent Dracula films with more advanced technology, special effects, costuming and make-up don't even come close to matching this film's haunting imagery, perhaps because all the recent films are based off this original and adapt vampire myths that were first introduced in this film. This film feels fresh, whereas other vampire movies I have seen are either ripping off this film or trying to be so original that it comes out looking trashy.

COUNTDOWN: Just 990 movies to go!

Nanook of the North-1922

2009-08-26T13:04:00.001-07:00

U.S.

Length: 79 minutes

Director: Robert J. Flaherty

Cast: Nanook, Nyla, Cunayou, Allee, Allegoo, Berry Kroeger

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013427

Eric's Impressions: The first documentary on the list is a fascinating look at the arctic life of Nanook and his family. The entire movie feels like a battle for survival and your heart breaks at the conclusion when you find out what happened to the family after shooting concluded. Some historians dismiss the impact of the film on future documentaries because a lot of the action was staged, but for me it didn't lessen the power of the imagery as the family really was searching for food and shelter throughout.

Natalie's Impressions: This is a beautifully shot and directed film. It is the perfect length because it isn't so long that the viewer loses interest. The narration is very good and Flaherty's cinematography captures the the Canadian North beautifully. The story behind the filming of Nanook and his family is as grand as the landscape they inhabited. Because Flaherty's original film footage burst into flames just as he was about to ship it to the US to be developed, he had to start filming Nanook and his family all over again based on his memory and because of this, the film is somewhat inaccurate as a documentary. But it is still a very influential film that tells a powerful story.

COUNTDOWN: Just 991 movies to go!

Orphans of the Storm- 1921

2009-08-26T12:34:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 150 minutes

Director: D.W. Griffith

Cast: Lillian Gish, Dorothy Gish, Joseph Schildkraut, Frank Losee, Katherine Emmet, Morgan Wallace, Lucille La Verne, Sheldon Lewis, Frank Puglia, Creighton Hale, Leslie King, Monte Blue, Sidney Herbert, Lee Kohlmar, Marcia Harris

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0012532/

Eric's Impressions: The final Griffith entry in the book is also the most drawn out and boring of his collaborations with Lillian Gish. For this time around, it's Gish squared as the sister of the actress, Dorothy, is in the cast as the blind orphan. Her "sister" is played by Lillian, but as the story goes, the two are not related by blood even though they look quite a lot alike. If you can get past this strange casting decision, and have an abundance of patience, then this movie might just tickle your fancy, especially if you're a fan of the French Revolution. What got me through this snoozer was the introduction of the guillotine as I was hoping for a beheading of every single cast member. Maybe I'm just sick of seeing Gish and being told how to live a moral life by Griffith. Either way, it's refreshing to know that this is the final act.

Natalie's Impressions: Huuuuuggghhh. Big sigh. Finally we are done with Griffith films! This was way too long and very boring. It took forever to get to the climax and once there, Griffith drew out for as long as possible to the point of being annoying. I got the point after five minutes of watching men on running horses then flashes of the guillotine. I liked Lillian and her sister in the film and I wouldn't mind seeing more movies with them as long as it is not directed by Griffith. His films are unnecessarily long and preachy.

COUNTDOWN: Just 992 films to go!

Way Down East - 1920

2009-08-22T22:30:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 100 minutes

Director: D.W. Griffith

Cast: Lillian Gish, Richard Barthelmess, Lowell Sherman, Burr McIntosh

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0011841/

Eric's Impressions: One of Griffith's more conventional stories is based on two different plays. Again we see Griffith constant, Lillian Gish, playing the role of a naive young woman. There's so much sadness in her face and actions that at times you just want to climb through the screen, give her a big hug and tell her everything is going to be alright. Richard Barthelmess plays the hero who actually does it. Intermixed with the melodrama is a lot of slapstick comedy that made me wonder if Mr. Griffith was watching some Charlie Chaplin reels during production. The action sequence near the conclusion on the frozen river/waterfalls seems pretty elementary by today's standards, but you can tell that the director put a lot of thought and time into it to try and make it all seem real. I wonder how many times Griffith and Gish would've won if the Academy Awards had been around at this time.

Natalie's Impressions: Although not as good as Broken Blossoms, in my opinion, I did enjoy this film. One thing that sets this film apart from Griffith's other films is the slapstick comedy that starts about an hour into the film as a side story line develops. The main story line is very dark, serious and depressing and then there is this very silly lighthearted section that juxtaposes sharply with the rest of the film. I thought it was a little jarring. Another thing I thought was unnecessary was the preachy morals and values lecture Griffith does at the beginning of the film, which makes it seem like some Christian moral propaganda. Early films tended to do this I suppose because film was seen as a new way to propagate one's ideas to a large population but as a modern viewer, I just want to watch a good story with good acting and leave the moralizing up to the viewer to make his/her own conclusions.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 993 MOVIES TO GO

Broken Blossoms- 1919

2009-08-19T19:14:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 90 minutes

Director: D.W. Griffith

Cast: Lillian Gish, Richard Barthelmess, Donald Crisp, Arthur Howard, Edward Peil Sr., George Beranger, Norman Selby

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0009968/

Eric's Impressions: Here we go again - D.W. Griffith and Lillian Gish. This winning team delivers every time out. I wanted to compare them to Scorsese-De Niro in this review, but then I read the same thing in the 1,001 movie book. Anyway, no subject is taboo for Mr. Griffith as he tackles interracial love between a a Chinese shop owner (played brilliantly by a white actor named Richard Barthelmess) and a neglected wife (Gish). The actors will rekindle their love in different roles in the next Griffith vehicle, "Way Down East," but we'll discuss that when we get there. No actress in film history can balance vulnerability and an innate inner strength quite like Gish. Here I gush about Gish again. Hopefully I don't make Natalie jealous.

Natalie's Impressions: This film blew me away. It is my favorite silent film along with City Lights. Lillian Gish is perfect, tragic, angelic and heartbreaking. In my opinion, this is Griffith's best and most mature film and one of Gish's best roles. The story itself is rather mundane but the cinematography, the acting, and the director's artistry make it anything but ordinary.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 994 MOVIES TO GO

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari- 1919

2009-08-19T19:09:00.000-07:00

Germany

Length: 71 minutes

Director: Robert Wiene

Cast: Werner Krauss, Conrad Veidt, Friedrich Feher, Lil Dagover, Rudolf Lettinger, Rudolf Klein-Rogge, Hans Heinrich von Twardowski

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0010323/

Eric's Impressions: This is one of those movies you will always remember and it might seep into your dreams, and/or nightmares, for years to come. Film historians link this German masterpiece to the Expressionist art movement of the time. The story is riveting, yet bizarre and the scenery is captivating, yet trippy as hell. I don't need to type this movie and Tim Burton's name into Google to figure out he was influenced by it. This is a scary flick and the surprising ending that you don't see coming will have you wanting instantly to watch it all over again.

Natalie's Impressions: Two things struck me most about this film: the bizarre, dream-like sets that actually looked they were made of cardboard and glued together haphazardly and the ending, which made me have to go back and watch the whole movie over again. Without giving anything away, I will say that this early horror film really set the standard for the horror genre. Although I am not a fan of horror films, I was impressed by this one.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 995 MOVIES TO GO

Intolerance: Love's struggle throughout the ages- 1916

2009-08-19T19:01:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 163 minutes

Director: D.W. Griffith

Cast: Mary Alden, Lillian Gish, Mae Marsh, Constance Talmadge, Alfred Paget, Erich von Stroheim, Lucille Brown, Frank bennett, Edmund Burns, William E. Cassidy

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0006864/

Eric's Impressions: So the story goes that Mr. Griffith made this film in response to criticism of his racist epic, "The Birth of a Nation." It was somewhat difficult to connect the dots after watching this one, but I do like the theme of "Love's struggle throughout the ages." This four stories in one narrative works as each is equally fascinating and feel like they each could break off into their own individual films. In fact, Griffith later did recut and released two separate features. Much like everything the director did, the sets were grandiose for their time and featured thousands of extras for the Babylon vignette. Lilian Gish is once again a tour-de-force, this time without even mouthing a silent word. It's a must-see for any film lover.

Natalie's Impressions: While not nearly as long as the 7 hour vampire movie, Intolerance is not a short little film. Griffith made this movie as a response to criticisms about his previous film, Birth of a Nation. Whether he made it out of spite or because he really had come to believe in the evils of intolerance, I don't know. But he sure went to a lot of effort to make it unforgettable, hiring 3,000 extras, designing expensive costumes and sets and writing the script himself. Of the four stories, my least favorite was the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of French Protestants by French King Charles IX and my favorite stories were the Babylon story and the modern story with Mae Marsh.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 996 MOVIES TO GO

Les Vampires-1915

2009-08-17T21:13:00.000-07:00

France

Length: 440 minutes

Director: Louis Feuillade

Cast: Musidora, Edouard Mathe, Marcel Levesque, Jean Ayme, Fernand Hermann, Stacia Napierkowska

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0006206/

Eric's Impressions: When I first saw the length of this movie I wanted to have my blood sucked out by a vampire. When I found out it was broken down into episodes in a serial format I was glad I didn't put a stake into my heart. If you like vampire movies, there are plenty of them all over this list, including my favorite, "Nosferatu, A Symphony of Terror," which we'll talk about soon. As for "Les Vampires" - it was at times hilarious, at times surreal and at other times a little scary. Though the "good guys" have their moments, especially the Chaplinesque sidekick Mazamette, you will most remember head vampire Irma Vep (played by Musidora) as she lights up the screen. The final massacre of the vampires definitely influenced the Robert Rodriguez-directed and Quentin Tarantino-produced, "From Dusk Till Dawn." In a series of firsts at the beginning of this blog, "Les Vampires" is the most influential of the thriller genre.

Natalie's Impressions: I was surprised by this film. I expected it to be like a lot of other silent films where, without dialogue, the story doesn't move fast enough to hold my interest. But with a film like this, where the melodramatic story is being told in 15 or 30 minutes, the pace moves along and there isn't much reel time that occurs without the development of some major plot point. I found some of the individual stories so dramatic to the point of being funny. For the time period, this was a pretty innovative film, however I don't think it was necessary to take seven hours to complete the story.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 997 MOVIES TO GO

The Birth of a Nation-1915

2009-08-16T11:00:00.000-07:00

U.S.

Length: 190 minutes

Director: D.W. Griffith

Cast: Lillian Gish, Mae Marsh, Henry B. Walthall, Miriam Cooper

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0004972/

Eric's Impressions: I recall seeing this film - or at least parts of it - in a history class at some point of my scholastic career. I mention parts of it because I don't remember seeing all of the overt racism that Griffith trickles throughout American cinema's first true epic. While I do enjoy some of the story - the romantic tale revolving around the always enchanting Lillian Gish tops the list - it's hard not to cringe watching the movie. Making the Ku Klux Klan into heroic figures at the picture's conclusion is equivalent to Steven Speilberg applauding the efforts of the Nazis at the concentration camps in "Schindler's List." Griffith never apologized for these cinematic injustices and even took offense to anyone that questioned his intentions. Thankfully, he stayed away from this subject matter in later achievements like "Intolerance" and "Broken Blossoms." Still, "The Birth of A Nation" broke the ground for countless war epics that followed and does deserve points for the creativity of its structure.

Natalie's Impressions: I also saw this movie in high school or parts of it in high school and remember being really offended by the black face actors, the "heroic" KKK, the misogynistic treatment of women, and all the other stereotypes this movie enforces. At times I was so disgusted I thought the movie should not be included in any sort of noteworthy movie list, especially since organizations like the NAACP came out strong against the movie the year it came out. At the time it was seen as too racist. I almost feel like that should overshadow the fact that it was groundbreaking for the war epic genre but I do see that being such a controversial film has made it so important in a discussion of early 20th century American film.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 998 MOVIES TO GO

The Great Train Robbery-1903

2009-08-16T10:49:00.000-07:00

Length: 12 minutes

Director: Edwin S. Porter

Cast: A.C. Abadie, Gilbert M.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0000439/

Eric's Impressions: Here's an obscure reference that will only make sense to people from Upstate New York or that have visited the area - when I watched this film, I felt like I was hanging out with the one and only Marshal Wild Windy Billy McKay in Storytown, USA. With that being said and to be completely honest with our readers, Natalie has intoxicated me with several White Peach Sangrias from the August 2009 edition of the magazine - Sunset: Living in the West. They are so tasty (Natalie is sound asleep behind me after just two of them). Highly regarded as the first Western, this movie really has it all from the robbery to the train ride to the riveting final shoot-out. When you do further research and find out the whole thing was shot in New Jersey of all places, you can't help but raise your cap - or cowboy hat - to director Edwin S. Porter

Natalie's Impressions: Although not a masterpiece in fine acting, I found this first Western rather comical because it is so basic. At times it feels forced and it is a predictable story line but I can understand that this movie should be included in a discussion of influential films simply because it was "the first one."

COUNTDOWN: JUST 999 MOVIES TO GO

Le Voyage Dans La Lune (A Trip To The Moon) - 1902

2009-08-15T20:17:00.000-07:00

France

Length: 14 minutes

Director: Georges Meiles

Cast: Victor Andre, Bleuette Bernon, Brunnet, Jeanne d'Alcy, Henri Delannoy, Depierre, Farjaut, Kelm, Georges Melies

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0000417/

Eric's impressions: Could the first movie also end up being the strangest? Stay tuned. During its time, this was a major cinematic achievement for many reasons with its length being near the top of the list. At 14 minutes, it was seven times longer than other films being made. It also was quite artsy for its time - leave it to the French. The most lasting images for me of this sci-fi comedy are the spaceship landing in the right eye of the moon's "face" and the use of umbrellas as alien-killing machines.

Natalie's impressions: I watched this film while living in China last year. Before I go any further, let me just say that now that I am back in the U.S. living with Eric, he and I will both only watch movies in chronological order. I was in a city called Dongying in Shandong Province teaching English literature at a local college. I was only teaching four hours a week so I had a lot of free time. Dongying is a very boring city. There is very little in the way of culture. At the time I watched this film, I had been living in Dongying for five months and I felt I had exhausted the entertainment opportunities the city had to offer. So Eric suggested I start watching more films from our book. I was able to find a surprising amount of the films online. I didn't watch them in chronological order. Rather, I watched them as I found them. Often I would watch movies for twelve hours a day. The day I watched this film was one of those days when I viewed six or seven movies because all the films were less than an hour or a little over an hour long. Now it might seem like watching movies like this would cause al the films to blend together and I did confuse few of them with similar plots and sometimes I would forget that I ever watched it. This film stood out in my mind because it was the first film in the book, it was extremely short and very very silly.

COUNTDOWN: JUST 1,000 MOVIES TO GO

Here We Go!!!

2009-08-15T17:02:00.000-07:00

Okay, so here's how the story goes. A few years back my (Eric) sister and brother-in-law bought us a copy of "1,001 Movies You Must See Before You Die" and our lives may have changed forever.

Always film buffs, this book has taken our obsession to a whole new and certifiable level. Much like zombies need human brains to survive, we need to finish this endeavor of watching all 1,001 movies.

Now we should introduce ourselves......

Eric DeGrechie's Stats

Age: 33

Hometown: Saratoga Springs, New York

Current residence: Northern California

Favorite Movie: One Flew Over the

Cuckoo's Nest

Natalie Singer's Stats

Age: 23

Hometown: Park City, Utah (Home of Sundance)

Current residence: Northern California

Favorite Movie: Dr. Strangelove

Let me point out that we're not trying to become famous with this blog (see Julie Powell) or become YouTube sensations (see Evolution of Dance guy). We're just trying to chronicle our journey through cinematic history for our own entertainment and a few friends/family (who we will pay handsomely for checking it out with hugs and kisses). With the help of the local library, video stores and Netflix, we plan to watch the films in order as listed in the 5th edition (2008) of the book. We will also be uploading fun videos on YouTube. We're excited, so without further adieu, here we go!!!